About us

JCall brings together Jewish European citizens who are deeply attached to Israel’s existence and security, while at the same time are very (...) Read more

Press releases

Articles

Events

Argument

Facing the outpouring of criticism unleashed by our Call to Reason, we have decided to open this column to several opinions written by various personalities, mainly signatories of this Call, along with those who have joined the Call or expressed their reactions as guests on radio programs. These exchanges will continue to be enriched in the future. Read more
Home page > JCall’s position on the Palestinian statehood bid at the UN

JCall’s position on the Palestinian statehood bid at the UN

Next September 20th, the Palestinians will ask the United Nations to accept Palestine as a member state.

13 September 2011

As this date draws near, JCall, who supports the 2 States solution, wishes to make the following comments:

The inalienable right to self-determination has allowed the Jewish people to fight for emancipation in the framework of a movement of national liberation, Zionism, which led to the creation of the State of Israel, recognized by the international community. In the same way, this right is the grassroots of the current Palestinian UN bid for statehood.

JCall deeply regrets that failures of leadership on both sides, rounds of violence and terrorism, and settlement expansion in the West Bank have resulted in two decades of unfruitful negotiations. The resulting status quo is no longer bearable because of the many threats it implies, especially after the Arab Spring.

Therefore, JCall understands how the frustrations caused by the lack of prospects have led the Palestinians to turn to the UN.

JCall, however, is well aware that this initiative can lead to the best or the worst. The worst would be a new round of violence, putting off for even longer any chance of ending the conflict, and the attack perpetrated a few days ago against the Israeli Embassy in Cairo is extremely worrying. This is the strongest fear of many Israelis and friends of Israel throughout the world, and ours as well.

At best, the Palestinians’ UN bid could be a step towards resuming direct negotiations, eventually leading to the creation of a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders, with mutually agreed land swaps, and a negotiated solution to the issue of refugees. In that prospect, this “unilateral” and largely symbolical move on the part of the Palestinians could have potentially positive outcomes:

- though theoretical, UN acceptance of Palestinian statehood would change the face of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict which would for the first time oppose two sovereign states.

- with UN acceptance, the resolution 181 voted on November 29th 1947 by the General Assembly of the United Nations would at last come into effect. This resolution called for the creation of two separate states living side by side in mandatory Palestine: a Jewish state next to an Arab state. For Israel, that would imply recognition within the borders of the 1948 war of independence and tackle fears of an international “delegitimization”.


8134 Signatures

View list

Sign the petition

Your contact information :

Any message or comment?
Newsletter

In the news

  • Haaretz — 2 July 2011

    Silent no longer

    Voir en ligne

  • Haaretz — 5 June 2011

    JCall launches first European conference ahead of UN vote in September

    Voir en ligne

  • The Jerusalem post — 5 June 2011

    Left-leaning JCall ready for first European conference

    Voir en ligne

Les autres articles
  • The Jerusalem Post — 7 December 2010

    Encountering Peace: The house is on fire By Gershon Baskin

    Voir en ligne

  • JTA The Global News Service of the Jewish People — 27 September 2010

    JCall opens German branch

    Voir en ligne

  • Jerusalem Post — 2 July 2010

    ‘Israel is not Sparta, it’s Athens’ by Bernard Henri Levy

    Voir en ligne

  • The Huffington Post — 7 June 2010

    Why I defend Israel by Bernard Henri Levy

    Voir en ligne

  • Yesh T’guva, The Paul Usiskin’s blog — 31 May 2010

    Eyeless Off The Sea Near Gaza

    Voir en ligne

  • Jerusalem Post — 17 May 2010

    US Jewish group urges concessions

    Voir en ligne

  • Haaretz — 16 May 2010

    U.S. Jewish leaders echo European call to end Israeli settlement building

    Voir en ligne

  • Haaretz — 13 May 2010

    Good for the Jews By Claude Kandiyoti

    Voir en ligne

  • The Middle East Channel — 12 May 2010

    JCall’s arrival on the European scene

    Voir en ligne

  • Ynet — 5 May 2010

    New initiative: European Jews want pressure on Israel

    Voir en ligne

  • The Jewish Daily Forward — 5 May 2010

    J Street, European Style: New Dovish Lobby Launches

    Voir en ligne

  • Jerusalem Post — 4 May 2010

    JCall founder denies placing onus on Israel alone

    Voir en ligne

  • JTA — 4 May 2010

    With JCall, European Jews get their own J Street debate

    Voir en ligne

  • Haaretz — 3 May 2010

    A welcome Jewish voice

    Voir en ligne

  • Haaretz — 3 May 2010

    Is Europe’s new Jewish group putting unfair pressure on Israel?

    Voir en ligne

  • The Jerusalem Post — 30 April 2010

    JCall, the ‘European J Street,’ to be launched in Brussels

    Voir en ligne

 
A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z

8134 Signatures

Date Name Firstname Title Profession Town Country Message
5 June 2010 Ashuach Assa mr designer london United Kingdom yes!
8 June 2010 Aaron Sandrine Mademoiselle Agent technique de Bureau Créteil France
19 January 2011 Aaron Garcia Garcia Mr Project Manager London United Kingdom
15 November 2011 ABACH PIERRE RETRAITE PARIS France Travaillant moi-même sur un projet de livre sur la paix au Moyen-Orient, il va de soi que j'adhère à 100% à la démarche de J CALL. Je pensais toutefois que la signature de l'appel s'adressait essentiellement aux personnes de confession juive, ce qui n'est pas mon cas. Comme je vois que des non-juifs ont signé l'appel, je joins bien évidemment ma signature. L'idée d'un retour pour Israêl aux frontières de 1967, aménagées pour tenir compte d'une éventuelle intégration aux futures frontières de l'Etat hébreu des colonies situées à la frontière de Jérusalem, avec compensation territoriale me paraît constituer la base d'un réglement de paix, mais l'écart entre ce souhait et ce qui se passe sur le terrain est tellement important que je m'interroge sur l'avenir, d'autant que je n'arrive pas à rémondre à la question: que veulent les israéliens?
25 May 2010 ABBOU Jacqueline retraitée Montpellier France
29 July 2010 Abboulafiah Karima Etiduante Sociologie Strasbourg France
18 May 2010 Abbushi Oliver Dr. Arzt München Deutschland Ich stimme voll zu.
26 May 2010 Abdon Barthès Anne-Marie retraitée Nîmes France
3 May 2010 Abdulghani Malek Liban Let's get it done! Enough is enough!
27 April 2010 Abecassis Frédéric Historien Lyon France
2 May 2010 ABECASSIS Léopold Vérificateur des Monuments Historiques Guebwiller France
16 May 2010 Abecassis Fortunée retraitée Madrid Spain
3 May 2010 Abécassis Frédéric directeur d'une association marseille France
15 May 2010 Abelin Peter Berne Suisse
18 May 2010 Abelin-Sas Rose MD Graciela MD Psychiatre New York United States of America

0 | 15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 75 | 90 | 105 | 120 | ...

A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z